Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Fishbach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Subject seems to have workable coverage even though he did not win on Survivor. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 04:29, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Stephen Fishbach

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Lacks notability; competed on, but did not win, Survivor. Bgsu98 (talk) 02:29, 7 August 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:39, 14 August 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:55, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and New York. Bgsu98 (talk) 02:29, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:21, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep: This seems, like, just over the line to me as a GNG pass. Could easily be convinced the other way, but this is clearly SIGCOV, and this is borderline SIGCOV? Plus this New York Times wedding announcement, which is a little routine but whatever, and the fact that he has a recurring blog on People website. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 17:28, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The first two are both from Entertainment Weekly so, for notability purposes, they count as a single source. I agree this is borderline. I'm undecided which side of the border. ~Kvng (talk) 19:52, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep because the referenced sources are not all from that one moment in time when he was on TV but some time later. There are older and newer sources. This indicates that this person is still being "noted" over a long period of time.--PiccklePiclePikel (talk) 13:11, 28 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.