Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Foster's sketchbook


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000  ( talk,  contribs ) 00:38, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Stephen Foster's sketchbook

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The sketchbook does not appear to be a notable artefact in and of itself; there is very limited secondary literature on it, beyond passing references. Hchc2009 (talk) 19:10, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - I am awaiting the arrival of a book with 32 references describing the sketchbook and its significance. I would like more time to incorporate this content into the article. Best Regards,
 * Barbara (WVS) (talk) 11:36, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If said sources are not yet available, then it may not be a bad idea to move the article to draftspace for now, then add the sources and relevance and submit it for review again. Moaz786 (talk to me or see what I've been doing) 01:59, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep, meets WP:GNG, article already has enough references to get it over the notability line, no need to "draftify" it. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - I agree, it sounds interesting in seems to meet notability guidelines. Smmurphy(Talk) 14:38, 31 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.