Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Hodges


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. &mdash; J I P | Talk 10:52, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Stephen Hodges

 * Appears to be self-propaganda, original research, and article itself admits the claims have not been responded to by the wider AI community Average Earthman 08:57, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research by a non-notable vanity poster. Usrnme h8er 09:00, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Usrnme h8er.  Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk   09:43, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.  Qaz  ( talk ) 09:54, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Kid with blog, delete. The Land 18:24, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Almost gave up searching, but the last minute proved fruitful. self propaganda? hardly. Post from 2003. (unsigned by 209.42.44.132)
 * Delete, OR. -feydey 23:21, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. vanity page, original research. Andrew pmk | Talk 00:42, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I reconmmend this page be transwikied to wikisource for further development, under the title "super calculator" --209.42.44.132 03:09, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity and unencyclopedic. *drew 23:08, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.