Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen K. Johns


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Stephen K. Johns

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Isn't mentioned in third-party sources (only primary court case references). Does not establish notability of the person. blurredpeace ☮ 05:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability for the convict, the victim/crime, the legal proceedings, or the public or legal aftermath. DMacks (talk) 05:10, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable per WP:BIO1E and Notability (criminal acts). JohnCD (talk) 09:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment, Interesting last words though, hits the nerve of "was justice served". Turqoise127 (talk) 14:54, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No third party WP:RS interest in the person or the crime shown. None found in search. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO1E. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:01, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.