Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Knapp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Singu larity  00:36, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Stephen Knapp

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Book advertisemet with no reliable third party sources. Article is an advertisement for a non notable book. Also, does not meet the standards of Reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 02:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 02:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 02:06, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Non notable person. Non notable book advertisements. No Reliable sources in article. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 02:07, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable guy. There is no reliable source. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 04:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice for recreation if notability can be established. But, at present, there seems to be no sources on the subject really independent of him. The ISKCON website is the only one I think really independent of him, and it probably doesn't qualify as sufficient for these purposes. John Carter (talk) 19:07, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:NOTE (non-notable) and WP:RS (no reliable sources). Also, his works are self published, and neither famous nor notable. -- Shruti14 t c s 22:16, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable person. Non notable book advertisements. No Reliable sources in article. Thanks.Govinda Ramanuja dasa USA (talk) 05:54, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.