Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Manoj Thompson (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. slakr \ talk / 10:59, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Stephen Manoj Thompson
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

His published books are not even in WorldCat. Not conceivably a notable author.  DGG ( talk ) 05:13, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I did some searching and I can't find anything to show that he's particularly noteworthy. His books are self-published and while that doesn't mean that they (or he) can't be notable, that does mean that they're less likely to have gained notice. I just can't see where he's gained any true coverage anywhere. Also in full disclosure, I want to add that I've blocked the article's creator for a COI username as they appear to be representatives of Mycottleville.com, which is a local business/events catalog that also offers service and business profiles. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt as this is the second nomination.--114.81.255.40 (talk) 11:54, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 17:24, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 17:24, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 17:25, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 17:25, 4 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete (and feel free to salt too). I know of notable photographers whose books aren't in Worldcat, but nothing about this article suggests that this person is among them. -- Hoary (talk) 23:39, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.