Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Marshall (effects artist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies.  So Why  08:50, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Stephen Marshall (effects artist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Won an Annie, but only as part of a team (most of the rest of the team's articles have already been found not notable at AfD). Boleyn (talk) 19:33, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:26, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — MRD 2014  Talk • Edits • Help! 18:02, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete While winning an award like the Technical Achievement Award or Annie indicates significant recognition for a major accomplishment, as is the VES award, the Annie and VES were awarded to a team, not him individually. The biggest problem is that there simply aren't enough sources to build an article from. Even the most rudimentary facts about the subject are missing. Beyond the fact that the subject was a member of teams that won notable awards we have nothing. I don't really see any alternatives; a mention in a hypothetical List of winners of Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences Scientific and Technical Awards perhaps, even though it would be a rather long list with over 50 awardees per year. Mduvekot (talk) 18:55, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix (talk) 14:18, 21 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.