Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen McLin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  A  Train talk 08:57, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Stephen McLin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While there are a few minor claims of significance within the article, subject does not appear to meet WP:NOTE standards Pure RED  &#124;  talk to me   &#124; 21:53, 13 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:33, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:34, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:58, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. ^ Other stuff exists is not a valid argument. However, the references seem acceptable. &Alpha; Guy into Books &trade;  &sect; ( Message ) -  12:55, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * KEEP: The subject was a high-level executive at a major corporation, whose business strategy and decisions were substantial enough to be documented in multiple books (referenced in the new article) as well as news coverage at the time. These claims of significance seem to be reasonably on par with some other existing Wiki biography articles. '

For example: Kirthiga Reddy, David B. Yoffie, or John Arrillaga, who are similarly cross-listed as Stanford alums and appear to have similar career prominence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.174.126.187 (talk) 22:07, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * — 128.174.126.187 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947(c) (m) 03:51, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- an unremarkable executive with WP:routine coverage, does not meet WP:NBIO. There are some passing mentions, such as in Bailout: An Insider's Account of Bank Failures and Rescues, but it's not enough for a bio article. Nothing stands out about him, so it's a "delete" for me. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:50, 5 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.