Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Moore (businessman)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 23:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Stephen Moore (businessman)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

WP:BLP issues aside, this article reads like a narrative of a resume, and I was unable to find any substantive sources on the web to back up any of the claims made about this person. Just not convinced he's notable. 2 says you, says two 14:44, 19 January 2010 (UTC) Update on sources
 * As of this revision, a number of references had been inserted:
 * One.tel press release. Press release, not independent. Only barely passing mention of subject.
 * ZD-Net news article on One.tel. Attributes information and quote to subject. No coverage of subject.
 * 3Gnewsroom.com article. Attributes information to subject. No coverage of subject.
 * SMH article on One.tel liquidation. Attributes information to subject. No coverage of subject.
 * SMH article on One.tel. States that subject is helping on the liquidation of One.tel and speaking at a forum. Not even close to "significant" coverage.
 * Auction summary. No mention of subject at all.
 * SMH opinion piece on One.tel liquidation. Mentions that subject was helping in the liquidation of One.tel, attributes information to subject. Nothing resembling "significant" coverage.
 * The Age article of liquidation of One.tel. Attributes information on the liquidation to subject. No coverage of subject (not even a mention of his previous role at One.tel).
 * Computerworld on One.tel selection of Lucent. Attributes information to subject. No coverage of subject at all.
 * Czech article apparently on Lucent. One mention of subject in an article in Czech. Doesn't appear to be about, but solely an attribution of information to, the subject.
 * AllBusiness.com article. Attributes information to subject. No coverage of subject at all.
 * Note I am not bothering to delve into whether the sources can be considered to be reliable for the most part, as it is irrelevant. Bongo   matic  03:59, 25 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: WP:BIO, WP:BLP. Unsourced. Google shows no indication of notability:, . — Rankiri (talk) 15:03, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the companies he headed seem notable, and the notable ones he is associated with he seems to have been in a minor capacity. DJ Clayworth (talk) 15:05, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is as close to coverage I could find. Not sufficient to establish notability. Bongo  matic  15:24, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not notable Venustas 12 (talk) 21:58, 19 January 2010 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —Grahame (talk) 00:46, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.