Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Philips


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  01:29, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Stephen Philips

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:BLP of a musician, not properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The notability claim here is essentially just that his music exists, and the only source being cited is his own self-published profile on the website of his own self-owned record label, which is not a notability-assisting source -- and it's been flagged for the referencing problem since 2014 without ever having any new references added. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to get over WP:GNG on real coverage in real media. Bearcat (talk) 20:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 20:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete The only sourcing appears to be a website which is involed in publishing his work. No indication of secondary sources that are independent.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:00, 23 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.