Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Romer (economist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 01:59, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Stephen Romer (economist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable university lecturer lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:ACADEMIC.  ttonyb (talk) 01:58, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol delete vote.svg|15px]] Delete — Per nom. ℳøℕø 04:34, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Could not find any publications or working papers for Stephen Romer in the Research Papers in Economics database (search results). The Year in Review could be considered a textbook, but it does not seem enough for notability per criterion 4 of WP:PROF. --CronopioFlotante (talk) 21:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.