Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Sharer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  JGHowes   talk  14:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Stephen Sharer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks wp:rs fails wp:gng Bollymine (talk) 10:22, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Bollymine (talk) 10:22, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bollymine (talk) 10:22, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:01, 24 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep: Sharer is one of the most subscribed youtuber with over 2 billion channel views thats passes WP:GNG and he has been covered by Newsweek, Cbslocal, PEOPLE magazine and others. Aksnahar (talk) 08:22, 30 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep: I did a little research and according to socialblade.com, he is in "TOP 250 YOUTUBERS ENTERTAINMENT CHANNELS SORTED BY SUBSCRIBERS" and "TOP 5000 INFLUENTIAL YOUTUBE CHANNELS" I have added this new reference. I feel his stats are significant enough to be notable and also he has some notable coverage such as Newsweek and People, as above editor has already mentioned. Expertwikiguy (talk) 01:32, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I wouldn't say it lacks RS. There are plenty of sources from the media on him along these lines like People (here), CBS NEWS, etc. He's got a big following and he gets a lot of sustained attention in the light and fluffy kind of media stories. He's a celebrity of sorts.4meter4 (talk) 20:17, 31 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.