Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Shooster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:13, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Stephen Shooster

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

PROMO article created by a banned UPE sockpuppet editor User:Jeremy112233 that fails every applicable notability guideline (ANYBIO, GNG, NARTIST). There just are no sources, because he isn't notable. Neither of the companies he has run are notable or would pass NCORP. The only source with any detail is this profile from the school he went to, on the occasion of his creation of a scholarship in his name, in honor of his daughter that also goes to that school. So... not in any way independent. Theredproject (talk) 18:18, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Theredproject (talk) 18:18, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Theredproject (talk) 18:18, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Theredproject (talk) 18:18, 3 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete This appears to be someone with a hobby, who has not been the subject of professional critical discourse. I see no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Vexations (talk) 19:48, 3 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete The Who's Who in Art listed here is no longer published, but I suspect in any case that one self-nominates for most of those publications. He has self-published a book that is a someone's life story. . The only notable thing that I can find is that his art is for sale at Saatchi and for impressive 5-figure prices. Nothing, though, indicates that works have actually sold. Most of the article is about his call center business, and that doesn't rise to the level of notability. Lamona (talk) 04:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:49, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, lacks significant coverage. Pika voom  Talk 10:43, 8 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.