Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Thomson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Snow delete. - PeaceNT (talk) 06:03, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Stephen Thomson

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

suspected WP:HOAX. There is no evidence such an anime exists. ANN has no entry on it at all. The content is contradictory (OVA doesn't air on Japanese TV), and 160 episodes? Such a lengthy series would certainly not have been overlooked by any of the Anime sources. No speedy option for hoaxes, so AfDing instead. Collectonian (talk) 22:35, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. I'm a huge fan of Gonzo Studios, who are the proclaimed to be the producers of this anime. If it ran on Cartoon Network since 2000 I would've known about it. Nothing on their website - either in English or from the Japanese i can read. Zippo on imdb. Proclaimed to be airing on the Anime Network who don't have it listed as a current or former show I don't think that a Japanese studio would make an anime about a NN American. It first proclaims to have 160 episodes, then in the table, claims to have 29 episodes. OVAs don't run for 160 episodes (OVA equals "original video animation", almost always some sort of mini-series). Seems to be a hoax hacked together using otaku jargon by someone who clearly isn't. Doc Strange (talk) 23:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Echo Doc Strange's comments.  Doesn't exist, plain and simple. A textbook case of WP:BALLS. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 23:21, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  00:34, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete This is an obvious hoax. WP:IAR should be applied and the article deleted as quickly as possible. --Farix (Talk) 00:42, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, only added help the snowball roll down the hill. —Quasirandom (talk) 01:11, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete One of the more poorly done hoaxes I've seen. Edward321 (talk) 03:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.