Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Waddington


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:24, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Stephen Waddington

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not enough significant coverage to pass the general notability guideline. Also not a notable academic, as a visiting professor. The sources cited in the article are either non-independent or are press releases/sponsored content. I find some passing mentions of Waddington, who is quoted occasionally in news media, but not enough to meet NPROF's 7a criterion, "frequently quoted". Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 06:14, 13 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:32, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and England. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 06:14, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - Article subject passes neither the general notability guideline nor subject specific guideline at NPROF. MaxnaCarta (talk) 06:49, 20 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.