Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen mattick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 06:58, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Stephen mattick

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

No sources whatsoever. Editor removed PROD. No indication of notability without reliable sources. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 13:25, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I've been trying to find some sources for a bit now. According to the guy's website, he's won architectural awards and been cited by the Prince of Wales...but having a real hard time discovering that independently.  I did find this, but he gets a single paragraph mention and that doesn't exactly establish his notability. Syrthiss (talk) 13:35, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment The information on the Telegraph award is verifiable, see . Is the award important enough in the field of architecture? There's some coverage at the G_Books, but I'm not sure if it is enough for an article here. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 13:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:49, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 21:19, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete awards seem to be of little importance and has little media coverage. -Drdisque (talk) 06:00, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Slight claim to notability, but this article is so much like a CV, in order to make anything encyclopaedic you'd have to delete the whole lot and start again. Not worth it in this case. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 10:35, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.