Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steponavičius


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. SNOW. Drmies (talk) 18:04, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Steponavičius

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

no surname bearers have a wikipedia article A:-)Brunuś (talk) 17:28, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * keep. Nomination irrelevant. This is an article about a surname. Also, all bearers are notable per wikipedia gudeline and wikilinked from many wikipedia articles. Mind you, if deletionism will start to prevail here, I will be forced to waste much more of my time and create perfectly survivable article stubs for redlinks, so this twinkle nom no pasaran here. - Altenmann >t 17:34, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, four notable bearers are listed, there is nothing wrong with the article--Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - more used to saying keep when the links are blue, but the evidence for notability is clear here. But creating new stubs or fully-worked articles on those topics certainly wouldn't be a waste of time. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:54, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It is waste of time when I have to do it in a rush, in areas outside of my knowledge. Of course, driven by editcountitis, I could have created single-sentence nanostubs, but the dicsussed page perfectly serves in lieu of them. - Altenmann >t 19:07, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Snow keep obviously.♦ Dr. Blofeld  07:31, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Question What do you mean by a "surname bearer"? Nyttend (talk) 12:22, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I guess any person who bears this surname.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:29, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 12:49, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 12:49, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.