Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stereo Hearts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:25, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Stereo Hearts

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Yet to be released single. No associated album article. No sources. Disputed prod No indication of meeting WP:NSONG. noq (talk) 18:03, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —  Meph talk 18:40, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

The reason why this article should not be deleted is because it is going to be a released song. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.162.68 (talk) 18:54, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment just because it will be released does not make it WP:notable. Please read WP:NSONG and explain how this song meets those guidelines. noq (talk) 19:13, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

I got the source from the Internet, and the article will eventally work this time because I wrote that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.162.68 (talk) 19:37, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

I think this article should be merged into the band who made this song and that way this article should be re-created rather than made again. --86.162.162.68 (talk) 20:02, 12 June 2011 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

 KEEP There's no point to deleting an article that's going to be recreated shortly. The song has made the Billboard Hot 100 and has been covered by Billboard multiple times |source, not to mention other heavily-followed sites |source, |source. It is a collaboration between two acts who are multiple best-selling artists and is sure to get more coverage as time goes in. It's notable and as such there's no reason to delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CWSensation (talk • contribs) 23:54, 19 June 2011 (UTC) KEEP I totally agree with CWSensation. It seems ridiculous to delete it when it will just be recreated. ≈  Alessandro  ♫T • C 11:00, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per Billboard, the song has charted in US and Canada. So there's that, combined with the sources provided above by Alessandro, plus the existence of additional sources (MTV, for example, which I've incorporated into the article). There's clearly still plenty of room for article growth, but at least there appears to be enough coverage and other criteria met to satisfy WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS.  Gongshow  Talk 20:39, 22 June 2011 (UTC)   Gongshow  Talk 14:03, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, song has charted on two Billboard music charts. Album titles confirmed, single cover, and multiple sources. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (contributions) • (let's chat) 13:57, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per EnDaLeCoMpLeX. The song has charted and has just enough sources to pass muster. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 19:06, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.