Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sterling EQ


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 22:57, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Sterling EQ

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Completing unfinished nom for IP editor. Heavy COI in article, minimal sourcing. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 21:10, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing to salvage here: reads like an advert, close to deleting on G12 grounds. There may be an article which can be written about this group, but this ain't it. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  00:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per Orange Mike. Article lead assaults the eyes of the common man with thinly veiled promotional writing. Has no WP:RS to go by other then user-generated content websites. Phearson (talk) 02:36, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Needs Wikification. --Ryan.germany (talk) 13:21, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.