Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sterling Harwood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Sterling Harwood

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Secondary sources do not establish notability. Gamaliel ( talk ) 04:40, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  04:09, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  04:09, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  04:09, 23 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Inadequate sources, minimal cites in GS. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC).
 * delete possible AUTOBIO. Fais WP:BIO and WP:PROF. LibStar (talk) 15:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.