Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sterner's Studio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by the nominator. utcursch &#124; talk 01:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Sterner's Studio

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to be a notable building. A search for sources comes up empty. Neither the glassworker who operates the studio nor the architect have articles here (though the architect has an article at the French Wikipedia), so there's nowhere to redirect to. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC) Withdrawn based on the sources given below. Thanks for the sources, guys. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:52, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:34, 30 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep, then trout nominator with a really big slimy trout: This article, on what looks like a very interesting and quite possibly significant piece of Art Nouveau architecture, was nominated for deletion four minutes after it was posted. That is just not acceptable. Let the author do his/her work first. Put it on your watchlist and get back to it a week later. Or how about trying to be helpful to a new user by suggesting what s/he needs to do to improve the article? --Hegvald (talk) 07:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * That's very odd. I did a search for the building's name and there weren't any sources. How could this have happened? The sources gave didn't appear in the search either. Anyway, once both users have replied here I'm going to withdraw the nomination. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:22, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. You can withdraw at any point. Please be more careful in the future and don't shoot from the hip at new articles (unless it is some clearly defamatory BLP or something). --Hegvald (talk) 11:23, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It happened because "Sterner's Studio" is just a rough translation of the native French title so as most or all the sources are in French it's hardly, if at all, going to show up in searches. --Oakshade (talk) 16:43, 30 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - An occupier or an architect of a building in Belgium not having in English is not proper rationale of a building being not notable. Doing an English title search of a topic with a different native language title is not the best way to perform WP:BEFORE either.  The Brussels Times calls the building "striking."   The Ministere de la Region de Bruxelles-Capitale has an extensive report on the building.  Nominating an article within four minutes of article-creation isn't helpful to anyone. --Oakshade (talk) 07:32, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    21:24, 30 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.