Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steuard Jensen


 * Looks like vanity to me. -- Jmabel 09:01, Jun 12, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Stormie 10:52, Jun 12, 2004 (UTC)
 * I've heard of him. I'd be surprised if he wrote it himself.  Probably not notable enough to keep though.  Morwen - Talk 12:42, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Someone who created an FAQ, not notable, delete. Question: How do people that apparently have the capacity to be at university think that articles like this belong in an encyclopedia? Wyllium 12:45, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * I tenatively vote to keep. I know this seems like a stupid decision, but it may very well be that he is at the academic forefront when it concerns the analysis and commentary of his subject; possibly the most influential in its genre. I wonder if this topic would have been recieved differently had the movies not been made. However, I think it does need cleanup. Rhymeless 01:28, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: personal promotion. No evidence that he is notable in his technical field. A graduate student who likes Tolkien -- so what? Wile E. Heresiarch 04:02, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)


 * For the record, I had no idea that any article about me had been added to Wikipedia (apart from my own user page here, anyway). Is there any way for me to find out what the heck was in the article in question?  In any case, I would be the first to agree that I don't deserve a Wikipedia entry.  Delete.  (Yes, I know the decision has already been made, and that I may not even be eligible to vote on such things at this point, but I want to emphasize that whatever the page may have been, it wasn't "vanity".)--Steuard 18:43, Jul 9, 2004 (UTC)