Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Andreas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk  19:10, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Steve Andreas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. All 5 references in article are self-published books (3 of which were written Andreas himself). Seems like some sort of promo article for him. Article does not seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. FuriouslySerene (talk) 16:05, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:35, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:35, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:35, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:35, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as none of this suggests satisfying the applicable notability and my searches have found nothing better so far. Notifying for analysis.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:37, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Although topic is fringe, there are high GS cites for his work. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:31, 22 March 2016 (UTC).

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:21, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.