Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Burgess


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete Nacon kantari  04:31, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Steve Burgess
Does not seem to meet WP:BIO. From the history, this also appears to be WP:VAIN. I originally slapped a prod on this months ago, but totally forgot about it, so here it is. Delete unless more third-party evidence comes up to explain why he is encyclopedic. -- Kinu t /c  02:53, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - scanty inforamtion on Google. Data recovery is notable but I agree this guy is not. BlueValour 03:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Plus, the guy who wrote it is User:Sburgess. AdamBiswanger1 13:32, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Melchoir 03:53, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:BIO, WP:VAIN. --Coredesat talk 04:48, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This page is unverifiable and possibly autobiographical, no reputible resources are listed resulting in pure original research. Read the history. Ste4k 03:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per Nom. Black-Velvet  08:59, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep He has made contributions to multiple academic areas and has business pursuits as well as law pursuits. How is this all so non-notable that he can't have an article? Vanity can be cleaned up. Ans e ll  01:12, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.