Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Corcoran (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:28, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Steve Corcoran
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Still not notable. As with the last afd, "Bio about a rugby player that does not meet WP:ATHLETE as the subject only played in U-21 teams. While there is some later local coverage of his work as a coach, it does not rise to the level we would consider to be significant." Recreation of previously deleted content posted deceptively by a shill at Steve Patrick Corcoran to avoid connection to the last afd. This page is fraudulently sourced, a 2000 article from the UK cannot possibly verify that his team won a championship in Texas, USA in 2014 and 2015. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:45, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  07:55, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  07:55, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  07:55, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  07:55, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:09, 15 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per excellent summary from the nom. This person doesn't meet the WP:GNG, but the deliberately inclusion of a number of misleading sources is especially reprehensible.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:33, 16 January 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete - it's baffling that there are so many fake sources here, and I think Duffbeerforme's analysis is almost certainly correct. In any case, neither WP:ATHLETE nor WP:GNG is met. --bonadea contributions talk 17:04, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Per excellent analysis from Duffbeerforme fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:36, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.