Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Crane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Closed - page does not exist. Wily D 10:52, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Steve Crane

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The subject has requested deletion via the system in 2611800. The article actually meets inclusion standards, however, since the argument could be made that the subject is only notable for one event, I bring this to the community for discussion. Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter. NonvocalScream (talk) 18:35, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Subject is not only notable for one event, no criteria for deletion is met in my opinion. -Drdisque (talk) 22:17, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. The subject is clearly notable and nothing in the article appears to be objectionable or damaging in any way to the subject. I can't think of a valid reason to delete this article.Broadweighbabe (talk) 22:36, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Subject meets our normal notability requirements.  Don't think it suffers from 'one event' as he palyed multiple games for two seprate teams in fully profesional leagues which is considerably more than one event (especially given that playing one for one team would've met our normal notability requirements). Dpmuk (talk) 22:54, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per everyone above.Nrswanson (talk) 23:23, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. As the original author. If the subject himself has said he doesn't want a page, then I would rather the page was deleted rather than causing offence. WikiGull (talk) 10:50, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Have proposed speedy deletion, which I think is within my right as article creator and sole contributor. WikiGull (talk) 16:06, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It is your right to propose deletion but it is the right of the community to decline it. TerriersFan (talk) 18:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - we delete pages on marginally notable people when they request it. However, in this case the subject incontrovertibly meets WP:Athlete. There is no BLP violation and I see no reason to delete. TerriersFan (talk) 18:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per everyone above.Inmysolitude (talk) 08:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.