Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Evans (blogger)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 06:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Steve Evans (blogger)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only one of the sources, the one from the Salt Lake Tribune, is actually an indepdent, 3rd party, reliable source that provides significant coverage. The rest is pretty much all bios on websites he's connected with, and blogs by him. John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The references are not independent of the subject.Car4tea1 (talk) 18:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC) Strike blocked sockpuppeteer !vote. Kurykh (talk) 03:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Any policy rationales to delete?

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 03:39, 28 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment The policy reasons to delete is that especially living people need to pass the general notability guidelines. And 1 article is not the multiple 3rd party secondary sources needed to pass these guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:30, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Most of the references are his writings and nothing shows he's a notable author. I don't see any significant independent coverage to meet WP:GNG. 2601:248:4500:9523:43C:32C0:AC8B:3F10 (talk) 20:32, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show he passes WP notability criteria.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.