Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Hakala


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 03:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Steve Hakala

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 07:35, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 11:30, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 11:30, 11 December 2015 (UTC)


 * 20-Mule-Team Delete: Even by Dolovis' brazen non-standards, this one is a doozy. One season of Division II college hockey.  A season and a half of undistinguished mid-minors play as a fourth-liner.  What the hell?  No source with as much as a SENTENCE about this obscure, NN player.  Demonstrably Dolovis was obsessed with creating Tulsa Oilers' related articles, but sheesh.   Ravenswing   15:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't meet NHOCKEY or GNG but to be fair at the time this one was created the requirement was only 100 games in any pro league which he had. -DJSasso (talk) 14:51, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: Just don't see the need to cater to Dolovis' notion that he'd "win" Wikipedia if he created the most stubs.  Neither you nor I go through (say) the all-time roster for the Springfield Indians and start creating stubs for every guy with 200+ games: Randy Miller, George Wood, Jim Holdaway, Gordon Tottle (hm, at least he was a 2nd Team AHL All-Star), John Rodger, Doug McMurdy, Tony Schneider ...   Ravenswing   21:18, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.