Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Heller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Userfied and deleted.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   17:01, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Steve Heller
Vanity by user:stheller - CrazyRussian talk/email 13:03, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom, but move content to his user space. -Ladybirdintheuk 13:17, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * neutral contravenes WP:AUTO but everything factual and nothing blatant. I would however consider him notable, having had books of his published by Prentice Hall and Pearson. Ohconfucius 13:18, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Prentice Hall is Pearson. FYI. - CrazyRussian talk/email 13:34, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Multiple published books. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:51, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Quite a number of books with major publishers. Article is short and totally factual.  Even if this is deleted, the article should be recreated by another editor.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  14:15, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Dlyons and inasmuch as, even as WP:AUTO and WP:VANITY look with disfavor on a user's creating an autobiographical article, where such user is notable and such article is neutral and sourced, there's no particular harm in a user's having created it. As to the subject's notability, I've never been certain of the propriety of WP:BIO's 5000 copies formulation, but I think this subject is likely notable even under more stringent criteria.  The most recent book (|C++: A Dialog: Programming with the C++ Standard Library) might merit its own article per Naming conventions (books), so I think its author most probably is.  Joe 22:03, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.