Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Heller (computers)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 00:36, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Steve Heller (computers)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No independent references in > a year. no claim of notability. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:16, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Authors of multiple books, published by reliable houses, are automatically notable.Wjhonson (talk) 04:40, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * That's not how I read WP:AUTHOR. Is there consensus on this?  As an inclusionist with a tangential interest in the topic, I'd like to keep this article, but cannot find any satisfactory basis for doing so. -- Visviva (talk) 04:48, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — -- Cirt (talk) 16:19, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 18 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:25, 23 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject of this unsourced BLP. J04n(talk page) 12:03, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.