Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Kellmeyer

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Coffee 10:42, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

Steve Kellmeyer
, (who has been trying to push some pro-Christian POV) created Steve Kellmeyer, which is definitely highly POV, possible vanity, but regardless doesn't seem particularly notable. The same goes for his books Sex and the Sacred City and Fact and Fiction in the Da Vinci Code. Dunc|&#9786; 22:25, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Severe POV. NN. Not encyclopedic.— Encephalon |  &zeta;   00:57:38, 2005-08-21 (UTC)
 * Delete per above Dottore So 05:52, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete seems notable enough but article is very POV and unpicking would be tricky, if the original author would like to spend time re-writing from totally NPOV, I will reconsider. Alf 08:07, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete This article is just horribly biaised. PhDP, 22 August 2005
 * Comment. Just thought I'd mention that severe bias or POV on its own is not usually sufficient reason to vfd. Articles that lack a NPOV, but which are nevertheless on encyclopedic subjects and in line with other WP guidelines, should usually be worked on to bring them toward the NPOV standard. However, in the case of the Kellmeyer articles, the subjects 1. do not appear to be of suficient notability to warrant inclusion in an encyclopedia, and 2. are intrinsically flawed because of their apparent authorship by an interested party; the few sources that are available because of the subjects' nn are non-independent and non-neutral, thus making it very difficult or impossible to use to write an encyclopedic article.— Encephalon |  &zeta;   01:44:53, 2005-08-23 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.