Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Levicoff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Steve Levicoff

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:N. Of the article's six sources, two are e-mail screenshots, and the other four are news articles which mention the subject only briefly. No substantive, third-party coverage was located. Historical-idealist (talk) 02:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Historical-idealist (talk) 05:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Radio, Education, Christianity, California, Pennsylvania,  and Vermont.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  07:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete I can find one mention of him in the acknowledgments of a book, and a handful of mentions in local newspapers (one line each). He does not meet NACADEMIC. There are no substantial sources about him. Lamona (talk) 15:09, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: I can't find much even for book reviews. This is rather brief, the source seems reliable . I don't AUTHOR is met. Oaktree b (talk) 15:01, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete in terms of WP:RS sources there are only a few passing mentions. Best, GPL93 (talk) 13:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.