Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Lux Jr.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Steve Lux Jr.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject fails to meet the general notability requirement at WP:GNG or the more specific criteria set forth at WP:POLITICIAN. Third party coverage is not significant, being limited in both amount and depth. JohnInDC (talk) 03:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:SIGCOV and WP:POLOUTCOMES. No reason not to keep. There isn't any specific reason why this article would automatically be non-notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.128.198.125 (talk) 03:52, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  03:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  03:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator. ElKevbo (talk) 04:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as none of this suggests it is actually better for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  07:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't know what the anonymous voter above thinks they're seeing here, but it's not what I'm seeing. WP:POLOUTCOMES specifies that a person who holds office at the municipal level in a town this size gets into Wikipedia only if the media coverage of them nationalizes into something far beyond the scope of the WP:ROUTINE coverage that all local town and city councillors can always expect to get from their local media. But the "coverage" here consists of three primary sources and two pieces of routine local coverage which just namecheck his existence while not actually being about him. So WP:SIGCOV has not been met here either. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 21:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. He's essentially a town council member (not even the chair or first selectman) in a rural town of only 5,500 people. Without more, I don't think that position confers notability. Kestenbaum (talk) 02:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with all of the preceding arguments to Delete, and also want to point out the article was apparently authored by the subject himself, in violation of WP:AUTOBIOG. Contributor321 (talk) 20:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete also agree with the deleting. Does not seem notable and it's written by himself.AlaskanNativeRU (talk) 21:06, 12 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.