Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Obsitnik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirected per agreement of nominator and all contributors. If he wins, it can be recreated. WP:SNOW, (Non-admin closure) --Chip123456 (talk) 13:46, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Steve Obsitnik

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Has been PRODded a second time after being deleted via PROD and then recreated so I'm bring it to AfD. The concern in the new PROD, with which I concur, was "unelected candidates for office are not notable just for being candidates; unless you can demonstrate that he was already notable enough before running for office that he'd be expected to have an encyclopedia article anyway, he is not notable enough for our purposes until he wins the election." Whouk (talk) 12:12, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 30 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to United States House of Representatives elections in Connecticut, 2012 per WP:POLITICIAN: "In the case of candidates for political office who do not meet this guideline, the general rule is to redirect to an appropriate page covering the election or political office sought in lieu of deletion." —Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 18:22, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect- Directly to section United States House of Representatives elections in Connecticut, 2012 per Articles for deletion/Common outcomes. Dru of Id (talk) 19:55, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Makes sense - happy for this to be closed and the page redirected. Whouk (talk) 12:01, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.