Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Padgitt (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Hog Farm Talk 16:30, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Steve Padgitt
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not enough content or independent references to meet WP:PROF Imcdc (talk) 14:16, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 14:16, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 14:16, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 14:16, 8 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. No assertion of notability.  Citations look a fair bit below meeting WP:NPROF C1.  No other clear path to notability. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 09:01, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. The citation record is not strong enough for WP:PROF, no other notability criterion is evident, and the previous discussion's close is not convincing and does not point to anything else that we might be missing (even if we ignore the mention of sources I supposedly supplied when all I actually did at that AfD was deletion sorting). —David Eppstein (talk) 07:16, 15 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.