Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Pasek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:44, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Steve Pasek

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Recently created biography of an academic. Appears to be completely absent from google scholar and hard to find in normal google (including German language google). No evidence of in-depth coverage by independent sources found. Biographies in French and German wikipedias also lacking independent references. PROD silently removed by SPA creator of article. Given that he seems likely to speak classical greek, church latin and coptic, there's a small chance there are sources in those languages to support notability, but I have no idea how to find them. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:26, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:28, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:29, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

I hope that the references are now sufficient to support the article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basilius Magnus (talk • contribs) 11:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete sources only support the fact that this guy is your run-of-the-mill university professor. Google provides nothing to disprove this. Minfo (talk) 12:27, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, perhaps even speedy A7 if somebody feels like it, no real evidence of notability given, publications and CV is not surprising for an academic seven years after Ph.D. Clearly fails WP:PROF. —Kusma (t·c) 19:31, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. Curriculum vitae without any evidence of encyclopedic notability. Cavarrone (talk) 09:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability. References are not verifiable.CouchSurfer222 (talk) 23:30, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable, poor english language sourcing. If user has sources in other languages then perhaps the article should be moved to a language that can be properly sourced. Peppy Fazoo (talk) 00:49, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.