Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Soffa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 11:43, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Steve Soffa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another vanity article, no indication of notability. Even google search doesn't offers any significant for him. Strange link found in Career Section.Ireneshih (talk) 06:52, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:05, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. His main claim to notability seems to be designing World Series of Poker bracelets for a year. Apparently, people didn't like the design. Fails WP:GNG. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:12, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: Apparently, the people did not like it (which can be included in the article), but that does not rule out the fact that he made WSP bracelet, thus making him somewhat known and notable. --BiH (talk) 12:57, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Reply. Slightly known yes, but you can't WP:INHERIT notability from a one-off bracelet design. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:52, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Cannot find an independent mention of him; all of the significance appears to be self-promotion in some form. Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:22, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.