Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve kaiser


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted by Master Thief Garrett as nn-bio. Stifle 00:49, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Steve kaiser
Hoax/unverifiable, completely ridiculous information that in my opinion only just misses qualifying as nn-bio (does claim notability even if it is ludicrous) and patent nonsense (nonsense but not patent). Amazingly there are a few Steve Kaisers out there, including two in New Jersey, but none I saw as being notable enough to make this article for. Confusing Manifestation 18:43, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete in case it wasn't obvious. And incidentally, I'm curious as to why User:Chris_73 thought it necessary to revert a single sentence that fits in perfectly with the rest of the article.Confusing Manifestation 18:47, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy this nonsense. 23skidoo 18:50, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, utter rubbish. Lincolnite 20:01, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. per nom. Meekohi 20:25, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete tagged as nn-bio / CSD A7 Segv11 (talk/contribs) 20:59, 12 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.