Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve marchena


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 19:09, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Steve marchena
Doesn't seem very notable; only 590 Ghits (bringing this to AfD only because of the valid objection to the prod) Rory 0 96 (block) 23:30, 21 April 2006 (UTC) Vote for keeping page - artist has several published albums, and has performed with or opened for well-known groups like the Boston Pops. Website also indicates artist has performed at several notable venues. vpoko -April 23, 2006


 * Delete Does not satisfy WP:MUSIC cirteria. If he has released albums they should be listed. DJ Clayworth 22:06, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

''This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that a decision may usefully be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!'' Mailer Diablo 06:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails WP:MUSIC. --Ter e nce Ong 08:05, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - highly likely to be vanity. - Richardcavell 09:53, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. If the places he has played could be verified independantly, i think it would constitute a decent tour and pass WP:MUSIC until then, it seems WP:VAIN. Mystache 12:44, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Touring schedule meets notability requirements; objections seem to be based on the peculiar belief that a working musician whose other credits are verifiable would maintain a fictitious touring schedule on his main website, even though reviews/reports corroborate geographical scope of appearances. Monicasdude 19:52, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The "touring schedule", isn't: it's a listing of gigs around Cambridge, Mass., with a couple trips to New York and New Jersey, not a "tour" unless you stretch the term into meaninglessness. --Calton | Talk 11:07, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.