Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Becanter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete Renata (talk) 08:13, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Steven Becanter

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I believe that this article breaks WP:N, and WP:V. I am also concerned that this article is a hoax. I have drawn the conclusions I have stated, because I have found no sources, apart from this Wikipedia entry, that mention a Steven Becanter. Thank you for reading. JEdgarFreeman (talk) 23:02, 6 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD under blatant and obvious misinformation per 0 results on Google. Pie is good   (Apple is the best)  23:06, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I thought Wikipedia is a place where anybody can write about whatever they want.  I wanted to write about my dad, so I have.  Why is that a problem?  Don't you like my dad, Ilikepie2221?  Are you saying he isn't worth an article?  SirEdman (talk) 23:11, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Not a single Ghit for "Steven Becanter". "Becanter" gives 16 hits, none of them related to this article. Likely hoax. SirEdman's reaction above reinforces that impression, WP:AGF notwithstanding. --Crusio (talk) 23:14, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Go home. SirEdman (talk) 23:20, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I am. And you just confirmed my suspicion that you are only here to vandalise. Big fun, we all had a laugh. Now go play somewhere else. --Crusio (talk) 23:28, 6 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete unless sources can be found. I'm sure he's a nice guy, but Wikipedia is for notable people and there's no evidence of that. Edward321 (talk) 23:32, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:49, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete endorsed and so tagged as vandalism.--Pmedema (talk) 01:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:V, possible hoax. Nsk92 (talk) 02:54, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Sure looks like a hoax to me. You could possibly argue it was a good-faith article but subject just isn't notable, but either way, there's no hope of passing notability with no sources. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 02:56, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete complete and total junk. JuJube (talk) 03:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.