Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Croman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:09, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Steven Croman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Very one-sided, with little to no intrinsic value. Dude's a property owner, and not even a remotely notable one.CerpinTaxt (talk) 17:13, 9 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lack of biographical sources, does not satisfy notability guidelines. - MrOllie (talk) 17:17, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. No notability established. --Phileasson (talk) 09:52, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong delete I don't agree with the nom's rationale being one-sided. Being one-sided is not a valid criterion for deletion, that's a WP:SOFIXIT issue. This article is, however, something that could have been speedied per A7.  Article was created and edited by a single-purpose user.  It's borderline adverising and I'd wager it's personal fluffery. Kill it with fire. Roodog2k (talk) 15:59, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:17, 10 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Not only that, but I will eat my hat if contributors Realestatewiz and Realestateexpert154 are not the same person. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 19:57, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.