Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Delisle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:43, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Steven Delisle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail WP:GNG with only mentions and local WP:ROUTINE coverage for signings and transactions (plus a fluff interview with the local paper while with the Lehigh Valley Phantoms). Gets the most mentions just for being a minor part of trade involving Rick Nash. Fails WP:NHOCKEY by not playing long enough in a well covered league and no individual awards. I would also say WP:TOOSOON but his trajectory for his recent signings and playing time in the lower level ECHL are not going in the right direction to get 22 more AHL games. Yosemiter (talk) 19:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  19:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  19:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  19:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: Agree with the nom here; there are no reliable sources presented that aren't routine sports coverage.   Ravenswing   03:07, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Couldn't find anything that would indicate they meet WP:GNG. -DJSasso (talk) 11:44, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Other than the Nash trade I couldn't find anything of note about him.18abruce (talk) 14:59, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails to meet either WP:GNG or WP:NHOCKEY. Papaursa (talk) 15:32, 25 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.