Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Disraeli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 15:47, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Steven Disraeli

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be a hoax. Sources don't even mention a person by this name. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:10, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails verifiability. Edison (talk) 16:17, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, as a load of tosh. If "Law enforcement agencies including Scotland Yard, Interpol, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP-GRC) and United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have no active files on Disraeli" then he probably fails WP:Notability too. It is nice of these organisations to open their files so freely! Perhaps it just takes a phone call along the lines of "Look, I am writing this Wikipedia article..." for them to look someone up for you. Jll (talk) 16:59, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Please Delete. Hoax, yes. Drmies (talk) 18:59, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- Undead Warrior (talk) 19:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, hoax. Funny how the two Mark Felt interviews listed as sources don't mention his name.   Little Red Riding Hood  talk  23:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as a blatant WP:HOAX. A search for Steven Disraeli finds only Wikipdeia and an ad] for "Even Steven Revenge Consulting". Googling "Even Steven Revenge Consulting" one finds these same two links plus only one more... to "getsteven.com - the "Official" website. What a hoot.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:52, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Undead warrior tagged the article as a CSD:G3 candidate. It's not pure vandalism even if it is a hoax so I've declined the CSD.  Let the AfD proceed. &mdash;   X   S   G   17:12, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per everyone. Hoaxalicious. Edward321 (talk) 03:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.