Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven E. Greer, MD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 01:33, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Steven E. Greer, MD

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

resume spam. almost all refs BY subject, not about subject. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:03, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    21:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    21:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC)


 * note was redirected to Stephen E Greer by someone else, but redirect target, is not noticeably better. I will try to transcode the AFD to the second page too. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:40, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete-per nom-there were a bunch of tags on here that were removed as well that looks like they were restored. Anyway-can't find much notability and sounds like a resume as someone put a tag for. Wgolf (talk) 22:22, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note I redirected it because both articles were identical. That is not an endorsement to keep the article. --Jersey92 (talk) 00:43, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I previously tagged this article with multiple issues including resume. It seems not to pass WP:GNG and is missing WP:RS and would need to be rewritten anyway. --Jersey92 (talk) 00:45, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep This article has many problems, but Greer appears to have had a variety of careers, and is potentially notable with the addition of secondary sources and wikilinks in the article and elsewhere to negate the orphan tag.--DThomsen8 (talk) 12:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Hmm, I'm simply not seeing anything convincing for keeping as my searches found nothing better and would need WP:TNT to be better. SwisterTwister   talk  05:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, unfortunately, agree with due diligence research by, , and , above. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 10:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.