Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven John Butt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. While normally it'd be fair enough to let the thing run, the issues highlighted with the article by those who wrote below combined with the SPA and obvious BLP issues led me to conclude it should be wrapped up now. Orderinchaos 16:02, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Steven John Butt

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Little in the way of actual notability, despite the size. Seems to fail WP:BIO; all sources are either him or unreliable. Ironholds (talk) 05:19, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. 85 sources and not one of them appears to meet WP:RS. While he has had coverage on CBS, it was a story about polygamy generally in which Butt was a mere example. In my view, there's not enough independent coverage about Butt to make him notable. --Mkativerata (talk) 06:01, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete As a massive failure of quality for the biography of a living person. SPA creation with an agenda.  Keegan (talk) 06:17, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, big article, little notability. Serious BLP issues, as well.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:51, 30 December 2009 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.