Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven R. Gilmore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:06, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Steven R. Gilmore

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Sounds like an interesting career, but doesn't have the significance or coverage to meet WP:ARTIST or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 09:06, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:11, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * A few citations of notability have been updated. Amber388 (talk) 16:34, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * the citations you added weren't properly formatted. I fixed them and added some more. BuySomeApples (talk) 19:37, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as new sources have been added by Amber388 and I also helped improve the page. BuySomeApples (talk) 19:37, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:22, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 15:07, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 14:20, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm inclined to keep but I do understand that from a purely 'legal' point of view, this artist, like almost every artist who hasn't obligingly died and got themselves at least an obituary, is bound not to meet current guidelines for artists' notability. In this case, the references include two books, so unless someone's got them to hand, and can show that they don't contain substantial material about Gilmore, that's two ticks for notability. Two more are interviews, and while we look dubiously at interviews because they're primary (the interviewee might have lied...), they are a sign that someone's genuinely interested in the interviewee (notability). But in the end, I think WP would be a poorer place with no mention of Gilmore. Elemimele (talk) 16:34, 5 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.