Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Richter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 04:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Steven Richter

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't appear to pass GNG Pipsally (talk) 13:16, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Pipsally (talk) 13:16, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete This article is written in an unclear way. – Cupper 52 Discuss! 14:14, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't see anything unclear about the article, and, anyway, if it was written in an unclear way that would be a reason for editing, not deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:46, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete there is nothing here even close to showing notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:25, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Nominator's Comment The user RRfeatures - current adding a bunch of sources either self published or with passing mentions - appears to be another name for Reverie films, which is Richter's production company. Pipsally (talk) 11:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Well spotted. I've left a message for him/her. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 * It's also worth nothing this appears to be a self-created article by the subject to begin with. The new sources being added have no substantive references to Richter's personal notability, being largely listings or non-notable reviews.Pipsally (talk) 12:06, 27 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - does not meet WP:GNG, see below Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: obvious (self?)-PROMO, non-NOTABILITY entity. GenQuest  "scribble" 02:14, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.