Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Schimmel

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete &mdash; Xezbeth 06:55, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)

Steven Schimmel
Vanity. Was nominated for speedy deletion; I don't believe it meets the criteria so switching to VfD. A Google search reveals several Steven Schimmels; the second link appears to refer to our Mr. Schimmel. &mdash; Knowledge Seeker &#2470; 06:03, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This same user also created a nonsense vanity article that was speedied - after he removed the tag from it twice. Firebug 06:06, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 08:40, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Good call to bring it here instead of speedy. Also a good call to delete this vanity article.  The anon user is welcome to create a user page.  Rossami (talk) 22:31, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pavel Vozenilek 02:26, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Vanity. --MikeJ9919 23:09, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.