Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Weigang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Subject is not notable, closing this early per WP:SNOW. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 21:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Steven Weigang

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This was originally tagged for speedy deletion per WP:CSD G1] as utter nonsense. I saw it as claiming the subject headed an organization supporting the former President Bush. I got 12 Google Web hits for the subject +"hero." The organization looks, with all due respect to the former president, not notable to me with Google hits here and being a member of Jewish Task Force is not necessarily notable. So I prodded. Creator deprodded. While I was typing, it was again tagged for speedy. Dloh cierekim  20:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)   Dloh  cierekim  20:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Patent rubbish, and even if this 'George W. Bush the Hero' organisation is real, 12 Google results is hardly enough to satisfy the need for reliable sources, even were the organisation noteworthy. Cheers. KaySL (talk) 20:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like total nonsense (in the interests of full disclosure, I was the one responsible for the initial speedy tag.) --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 20:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Yeah, and I CSD tagged it second. Totally my mistake; I thought the article creator had removed it. Sorry. KaySL (talk) 20:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem. happens to us all.  Dloh  cierekim  20:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  20:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * reply to albert after multi ec's-- At first, I thought so too. The third time I read it, a light dawned.The Web page for the organization claims 78,000 hits. Dloh  cierekim  20:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: Doesn't appear to be notable. All I can find are forum posts and YouTube materials, nothing that satisified WP:Notability or WP:BIO. Jo7hs2 (talk) 20:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy -obviously  Dr. Blofeld       White cat 21:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete--lack of notability. Drmies (talk) 21:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The organization is clearly not notable; the founder, even less so.  Graymornings (talk) 21:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.