Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Yearley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. j⚛e deckertalk 05:45, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Steven Yearley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

simply not notable. fails WP:ACADEMIC. No ghits. but we know he has a namesake who is a convicted rapist.  Ohc  ¡digame! 09:11, 3 September 2014 (UTC)  Ohc  ¡digame! 09:11, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 September 3.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 09:27, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, the national academy of Scotland. He co-authored a book chapter on "epistemological chicken" and, though I am not smart enough to figure out what exactly that is, he is pretty widely cited because of it. EricEnfermero  HOWDY! 10:55, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - GScholar gives an h-index of 30, and 10 papers with over 100 citations each - high numbers for what I believe is not a particularly highly-cited field. PWilkinson (talk) 12:35, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:01, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Widely published and widely cited academic. GBooks has independent sources discussing his work. --Michig (talk) 06:38, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.